Quantcast

KNOW YOUR STATS: Find out what data is important and know how to read it


Guest Post by Daniel Elroy

No two stats are created equal.

Alas, it is a cruel truth that certain statisticians are just going to have to accept. These days, online marketers are able to collect an overwhelming amount of data from consumers. While it’s easy to get excited by the sheer volume of information available (“Wow, our product is extremely popular with divorced men who chew spearmint gum and are over six feet tall!”), the key is to zero in on the data that’s most relevant to you and optimize your campaign based on that analysis.

KNOW YOUR GOALS

We’ve all heard the overused maxim “Know thyself,” but there’s a valid reason it’s managed to survive all these centuries: it’s good advice. If your goal is brand awareness, then an email marketing campaign might be deemed successful based on open and click-through rates. On the other hand, if you’re striving for consumers to spend a fairly substantial amount of time on your website, then an enormous visitor rate simply isn’t going to cut it. An online marketing campaign can set itself up for great results by establishing from the outset certain criteria for which success will be judged, thereby allowing the analysis of future data collection to be as useful and streamlined as possible.

BE FLEXIBLE

So you’ve established your goals, and everything seems to be going swimmingly . . . except for the fact that you’ve totally misjudged the type of consumer you thought you’d attract. You thought your campaign was going to appeal to pimply male teenagers who wear braces, but it turns out that debonair older women who wear braces are the ones turning up in droves. Well, is this a bad thing? You can use the data you’re collecting to help nurture your newfound demographic and perhaps completely reassess your target audience, or you can stay the course and use the stats to determine why young men aren’t buying what you’re selling. A good way to collect useful data is the time-honored questionnaire, which you can use to pinpoint your audience’s precise likes and dislikes. Tactics & Techniques Video walkthrough demonstrating some tools & tactics which can be used to research your market online

(video courtesy of Web Analytics World)

KEEP YOUR HEAD

It’s easy to overdose on the abundance of information coming in during the course of a campaign. When a particularly striking anomaly occurs, it’s prudent to keep a level-headed approach to the data. While a sharp spike or drop can’t help but get your attention, it’s necessary to consider the root causes. Any number of things can cause this sort of “rogue data.” For example, a controversial comment on your website posted by a consumer or even a certain holiday approaching can cause certain consumers to seemingly disappear (or reappear) overnight.


FINAL THOUGHTS

The ability to collect data for the purposes of internet marketing will surely only increase in the coming years. By establishing goals, embracing flexibility, and maintaining composure, companies with successful campaigns can avoid getting drowned in the tidal wave of available information, and instead use the stats they’ve gleaned to reach their full potential.

Lies, Damn Lies and Info-graphics

Should we just consider badly constructed Info-Graphics as nothing more than pieces of “Graphic Art”, or should the potential to mislead be a serious concern to us all?

The persuasive power of numbers, in the form of statistics, has been used and abused by everyone with an argument to make since the first abacus was invented. However as we all know pictures “speak a thousand words” and the growth of Info-graphics, and the tools that produce them, has been prolific.


And so to my point… given how our little human minds work, our eyes are literally “drawn to pictures”, (see the link to a revealing example of this below ! ). Pictures make an impression like no table of numbers ever can. Properly executed this is a powerful tool for education and good, badly executed this is not only a waste of an opportunity it could even be used to deliberately mislead.

What factors determine a good info-graphic from graphic-art? – Here are a few suggestions and I welcome your thoughts….

  • Credible source data and source accreditations
  • Accurate interpretations of scale (e.g. don’t represent stated numbers with a picture unless the scale accurately represents those numbers)
  • Careful use of color conventions (try painting a start sign red and a stop sign green and you will see what I mean)
  • “Balanced” written commentary

Cisco's Internet of thingsTry working through this recent info-graphic (click to view) from the good folks at Cisco. Since the source is a reputable one I am going to take the figures as read – even the ones we can’t easily prove or disprove such as the number of IP addresses vs atoms on earth. (personally my first instinct is surprise at this however any physicists out there please reveal your answers now…)

It’s an interesting picture that combines simple line and picture drawings to represent connections and tell a story over time. It also uses diagrams such as the world population that are unclear as to whether the size/volume of the shapes represents actual numbers (or just a graphic to show rising size).

When you take an info-graphic apart in this way its surprising how more questions than answers can be raised.

(For those of you interested in the focal power of images on the human mind – in this case the male mind – and who haven’t yet heard of the (true) story of how Schiphol Airport in Amsterdam reduced their cleaning bills in the gents restrooms you might want to check this out)

Infographic Resources

Visual.ly – an infographics resource with promise of more tools to follow…

Gooogle Public Data Explorer – in beta with Google Labs, so I’m not sure where the team will relocate this app to but it’s worth checking out before it moves

Infomous – we’re divided on this Twitter graphic as to whether this is a true info-graphic or more graphic art, what do you think?

Google+ oversharing issues – a video walk through

While watching the Facebook Announcement on Video chat I was also messing around with Google plus, reorganising my existing circles and looking forward to reorganising all my remaining contacts. Mark Zuckerberg talked about sharing and the growth that is being seen in sharing activity, did you know that there are over 4 billion things shared every day?

It got me thinking that I should perhaps stop having fun “circling” my friends and take a look at the privacy and sharing settings on Google+. If you’ve just set up your Google+ account this quick walk through should be of use, especially if you’ve been focusing on the more exciting functionality of circles and huddles.

Although Google are advising that a Google+ experience for business will be coming in this year, there may be times when showing you as an individual is appropriate and if you want to use Google+ as an individual, now is the time to become more familiar with the privacy settings as Google has confirmed this week that private profiles will be deleted at the end of July.

If you have concerns about oversharing this short video will show you the options that are available for both your profile, the things you share and for those ever popular circles.

The Filter Bubble & Personalization

So what is happening to our interweb these days? It’s been several years now since the web evolved into a truly interactive arena. With the advent of blogs, wiks, social networks, eBay selling, Amazon self publishing etc. end users started to became publishers, online retailers, product creators and so on. Effectively the end users of the web started to become the new generators of the web with the smart bigger player simply providing a platform for this to happen. The wonder of user generated content.

This was (and still is) exciting stuff as the result of this new dynamic opened up communication channels and provided platforms for information sharing, collaborations, commerce and much more. This was a technology shift which actually delivered something much broader than new functionality. It gave the power of the internet back to its end users, it connected everyone & provided everyone a platform (multiple platforms) to publish, interact with etc. and in many ways was the first true facilitator of global freedom of speech.

OK I may be getting carried away here and there is obviously some good & bad stuff which has come out of this new dynamic, however I am a believer that this sort of connectivity and free, open access to information has a huge part to play in how we evolve as a species (yes I am getting carried away).

So what is going on now – The Rise of the Machines
One of the biggest problems with this interactive internet is that the sheer volume of content being published is huge & is increasing exponentially. There is an obvious need for smarter technology filters & mechanisms to help users find the right information, qualify quality & so on. This is a big challenge and one that should absolutely sit with the  major search engines, social networks etc.

My concern is the approach which some of the big players seem to be taking to solve these problems. I have been aware for some time that Google is personalising my search results and not just based on my location but my search history and various other criteria. I work in the internet marketing space so I should be aware of what is going on here however I doubt the average end user is aware that their online experience is being tailored to them based on their location, web activity etc. Google plus takes this whole thing even further by personalizing results based on personal networks & connection but we will cover that one in a future post.

This all feels a little strange to me and doesn’t quite fit with the ‘globally connected platform’ I described earlier in this post. I came across this video from Eli Pariser which does a far better job at articulating my concerns than I ever could. This is definitely worth watching

Very thought provoking. I personally wasn’t even aware that Facebook were personalising wall content based on your Facebook activity/interactions – ever wondered why you never see updates from some of your friends?

The Good
So what are the benefits of this sort of online personalization. Users will be potentially delivered more relevant results, for example results based on their location (local businesses, services etc). They will also be targeted with ads which are more likely relevant to them (based on their location, online behaviour etc), their search experience may be tailored to reflect their interests. Local businesses are certainly a worthy winner from personalization as location based search results give local companies the advantage in their specific geography. I have to say this is definitely a good thing.

From an internet marketing (commercial) perspective it’s like Christmas right now. You can target web users to the Nth degree using the demographic and behaviour based advertising tools made available through Facebook, Google and others. You can even track site visitors and retarget them with ads when they are visiting other people websites.

The bad & the Ugly
The more personalized your online experience becomes the less ‘globally connected’ you truly become to all of the information on the web. It becomes a web of one and your search experience will absolutely be restricted. I may be being dramatic again and its obviously not a clear cut case of good and bad (right and wrong) however I think there are some key questions to ask here.

What are the motivations of the big guys?

Why are they switching on these layers of personalisation by default without asking user permissions?

Why don’t they offer the best of both worlds by giving users the option of global/personalized results?

Are they trying to create great customer experiences, improve the internet, make more profit.?

We would love to hear your thoughts on this.