Google Receives 64% of Searches in October – Hitwise


Hitwise today announced that Google accounted for 64.49 percent of all U.S. searches in the four weeks ending October 27, 2007. Yahoo! Search, MSN Search and Ask.com each received 21.65, 7.42 and 4.76 percent respectively. The remaining 49 search engines in the Hitwise Search Engine Analysis Tool accounted for 1.68 percent of U.S. searches.

Percentage of U.S. Searches Among Leading Search Engine Providers

Domain

Oct.-07

Sept.-07

Oct.-06

http://www.google.com/

64.49%

63.55%

60.94%

search.yahoo.com

21.65%

22.55%

22.34%

search.msn.com

7.42%*

7.83%*

10.72%*


http://www.ask.com/

4.76%

4.32%

4.34%

Note: Data is based on four week rolling periods (ending Oct. 27, 2007, Sept. 29, 2007, Oct. 28, 2006) from the Hitwise sample of 10 million US Internet users.

* – includes executed searches onLive.com and MSN Search.

Source: Hitwise


Google an Increasing Source of Traffic to Key Industries

Search engines continue to be the primary way Internet users navigate to key industry categories. Comparing October 2007 to October 2006, the Travel, Entertainment and Business and Finance categories showed double digit increases in their share of traffic coming directly from search engines.

U.S. Category Upstream Traffic from Search Engines and Google – October 2007

Category

Percent of Category Traffic from Search Engines, Oct-07

Change in Share of Traffic From Search Engines, Oct-07 – Oct-06

Percent of Category Traffic from Google, Oct-07

Change in Share of Traffic From Google, Oct-07 – Oct-06

Health and Medical

45.14%

4%

29.08%

6.17%

Travel

32.58%

12%

21.31%

23.54%

Shopping and Classifieds

25.80%

1.9%

16.01%

6.52%

News and Media

21.03%

n="center">7%

13.41%

11.01%

Entertainment

21.69%

15%

12.93%

16.17%

Business and Finance

17.02%

19%

10.36%

30.81%

All figures are based on U.S. data from the Hitwise sample of 10 million Internet users.

Source: Hitwise

Could Ask.com Finally be on the Right Commercial Track?

HitWise’ Bill Tancer recently noted that Ask.com has experienced a lift in weekly market share. The question is, did Ask.com’s new marketing campaigns cause this?

Well, like all broadcast messages it’s hard to tell for sure. They are definitely better and less offensive than the previous “algorithm” commercials. They seem to be getting closer to the mark, but yet still way off.

However, Ask.com is trying too hard at mass marketing. Mass marketing is dead.

Unfortunately, there is a lot missing from Ask Sponsored Search program that we can not buy into. Until we can get it, I can not recommend the product to friends and family.

Ask.com could save time and money by going after a small, yet ignitable audience … us. As online marketers, if we like the product we will spread the words.

Online marketers need to “buy in”, before Ask expects others to adapt. By following PyroMarketing rules, Ask.com can make small steps that can prove wonders.


** Find more articles from John W Ellis at http://www.johnwellis.com/

Ask.com commercials – still moving in the wrong direction

As I suggested in a recent PPCHero.com interview (“Targeting Google Only Reminds the Consumer That Google is Number 1”), Ask.com made some bad promotional decisions with their “algorithm” campaign.

Even though they have dropped the algorithm message recently, they still need another basic marketing lesson. Telling the consumer you are not number 1, only reminds them they should use #1. Not you.

Clearly Ask.com is targeting Google in their latest ad. Ask.com needs to stop trying to be Google.

However, this is not to say that Ask.com can not be bigger then Google. They most certainly can, but not by trying to be Google. Google is Google, so Ask.com can not be Google. You can not go back and change the past. Currently, you have nothing to offer that they do not have already.

Consumers don’t remember #2 or # 3. Only #1.

A great marketing book is “Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind“. Authors Al Ries and Jack Trout ask some interesting questions:

What’s the largest-selling book ever published? – The Bible” What’s the second largest-selling book ever published? … Who Knows? … If you didn’t get into the mind of your prospects first, then you have a positioning problem.

Ask.com has a positioning problem. They have to find something to be first in. Otherwise, there is first place … and everyone else.

** Find more articles from John W Ellis at http://www.johnwellis.com/

Search Engine Market Share, Visits from comScore and Compete

Search Engine Market share data from comScore, released earlier this week:

Google (GOOG): 49.5% down from 50.7%
Yahoo (YHOO): 25.1% down from 26.4%
Microsoft (MSFT): 13.2% up from 10.3%
Ask.com : 5.0% no change
AOL (TWX): 4.2% down from 4.6%

Search Engine Market Share data from Compete.com

The number of visits to the 5 major Search Engine properties from June 2006 – June 2007.

Related Stories

Top Universal Search Influencers

To recap, Universal Search is a term coined by Google in which results from different vertical search engines (images, video, news etc…) are integrated into Google’s regular search results.

But when will these different search results show up? For example, what causes a video of a presentation by Steve Jobs to appear within the organic search results for the query: “Steve Jobs” Obviously it has to do with Google’s sophisticated algorithms which can correlate the right content to a user’s query, however here are some factors that I think can help influence the Universal Search results:

  1. Number of Searches per Individual Search Silo – This theory is based on shear volume for a given query on a given vertical search engine. For instance if the query “scenic mountains” has a high number of searches within the image search, perhaps this influences the top images to appear within Universal search for the same query.
  2. Performance through ratings and views – This applies mostly to Video Search because on YouTube and Google Video both ratings and the number of views are kept track of. Could the ratings/views affect the appearance of videos with Universal Search?
  3. Clicks per listing - Google applies this same type of algorithm on both AdWords and organic search results therefore it’s something that can help Google gauge the relevance of non-text based results.
  4. Time Spent - With the Google Toolbar installed on so many users’ computers as well Google Analytics installed on so many websites, Google can start to understand how engaged users are with a website (after a user clicked on a listing) by measuring time spent.
  5. Return Visits - If a user clicks on a result listing, visits a website/image/news listing, returns immediately and clicks on another listing and continues this cycle, will Google start decreasing the quality of the websites/image/news listings that were selected?
  6. Usability - While at Searchology I found out that Google performs rigorous usability testing using eye tracking to further understand users’ search behavior and reactions to different types of search results.

Google and ASK.com are both heavily involved with perfecting Universal Search and as search marketers it will be important for us to help our clients create relevant content which is not necessarily just text anymore. Go here: for strategies for Universal Search