Quantcast

Social Recruiting: Is it an Equal Opportunity Hazard?


Here is a question for all recruiters and HR professionals: If your organization relies heavily on the use of social media, LinkedIn or search tools to fill your candidate pool – Is there not a risk that you are restricting the supply of talent your business needs by overlooking the potential of the broader market? Are you also risking a breach of Equal Opportunities legislation?

I am more interested in the spirit of Equal Opportunties legislation here than the exact wording or the nuances of the law in different countries. I believe the root of all this legislation is very simple and most people would agree that everyone, regardless of age, gender, race, physical ability, religious belief etc. deserves an equal chance of being employed by you determined by selection criteria based on the job to be done… simple!

Most organizations of any stature have equal opportunity policies (they may even have been legal counsel approved)…job done…? or is there something that has been overlooked? If your process only really kicks in once you have a candidate selection pool… how are you forming that pool in the first instance?

Let’s go fishing for talent

Image of a colorful aquarium with fishThe sea is rich in life. There are species of sealife that can feed you, kill you or cure you. If I am a bit lazy and short of time it’s easy to stand on the banks of a local lake that has been stocked with trout for sportsmen just like me… Caught 7 today … All Trout!   Even if I venture away from the local trout stocked lake and onto the high seas in a boat with only shrimp bait on board it’s a fair bet that we know what we will catch.


The pitfalls of candidate pre-selection

My argument is this. Everybody (even although we try to be aware of the danger) is prone to personal prejudice. If your organzation is overly reliant on Social media and LinkedIn style talent attraction then you run a risk of having a starting pool of talent (i.e. the talent pool that becomes subject to your Equal Opportunity selection policy and from which you select your shortlist for interview) that does not represent the wider market. 

After all, not everyone is to be found on social or business network sites  – indeed I wonder if there will be a growing split in the use of these sites with millions creating profiles but also those (especially senior candidates) pulling back from them on concerns over privacy etc.  Add to this the potential personal bias of recruiters when they are searching for talented people and the concern is clear.

Social and Network recruiting – finding the right mix

There are plenty of arguments for using tailored search within Social and Specialist Network sites – the ability to identify candidates in these ways is exciting and been proven time and time again.

I run the risk here of taking the fishing analogy a little too far but remember that if you only ever fish with a few different types of bait you are potentially missing the very special, the unusual and the unknown.

Find ways to engage with those who don’t yet know you and those who simply have never signed up to the networks you are using … sometimes you need to trawl with a much bigger and different shaped net.

 

 

 

Facebook vs. Orkut in India

Three years ago in the early days of social media I wrote a blog post asking people to vote between Facebook and Orkut in regards to their favorite social network. Over 6,000 votes later, we’re still at a deadlock with nearly a 50/50 split in voting. At the time, Facebook was in the early stages of gaining momentum, whereas Orkut was extremely popular in both India and Brazil.

Recently, Hitwise launched some numbers showing the most popular sites in India. While Orkut has traditionally dominated in the social network space in India, the latest data shows that Facebook has even captured top spot (in social networking) there as well. In the graphic from Hitwise below you’ll notice that Facebook sits #3 in the top sites and captures over 5% of all visits whereas Orkut is in the number 8 spot with just over 2% (Google India and Google, well out in front with the top 2 spots).


Social Network Ad Spending $4+ Billion in 2011

Great article from eMarketer yesterday which discusses the concept of how social marketing is growing across the globe and not just in the United States. eMarketer uses the following stats to back up their point:

  • Facebook is popular with 500 million users, but QQ in China is larger with over 550 million users
  • The social network/blog category reached 86% of active internet users in Brazil (Nielsen)
  • In New Zealand, Hong Kong, Canada and Singapore Facebook was the No. 1 website (not Google)
  • In Poland, Nasza Klasa reached 58% of internet users as of spring 2010, making it the No. 3 website.
  • Netlog (out of Belgium), has increased its user base to 68 million members as of July 2010
  • Social Network ad spending will grow to over $4 Billion in 2011

MoshiMonsters.com Gaining on Club Penguin and Webkinz

According the latest post from the Hitwise blog, MoshiMonsters.com (a children’s social networking/gaming site) has started to make some noticeable traction against Club Penguin and Webkinz. Below is a summary of the post:

  • Moshi Monsters offers visitors the chance to adopt a pet monster and take care of their monster by earning a virtual currency called ‘Rox’ through solving educational puzzles that test math, logic and vocabulary skills.
  • The volume of visits to MoshiMonsters.com increased 23x within the Entertainment – Games category for the week ending March 20, 2010 as compared to the same week last year. In comparison, visits to Club Penguin increased 20% last week year-over-year while visits to Webkinz were down 41%.Last week, Google.com was the highest referral source to MoshiMonsters.com, responsible for 24% of the upstream traffic to the website and 74% of those visits were from returning visitors (meaning visited the website in the past 30 days).
  • The share of returning visitors from Facebook and YouTube, the 2nd and 3rd ranked websites for referrals were even higher at 82% and 86%, respectively.
  • As with the UK, the visitors to Moshi Monsters tend to be from affluent families that are likely be more willing to pay for a membership to use the website.

Did Connect Help Facebook Beat MySpace?

According to the latest blog post from Hitwise, they believe that it was Facebook Connect which helped push them over the edge and surpass MySpace in market share. Highlights from the post are below:

  • The Social Networking category has experienced a resurgence of growth as websites like Facebook and Twitter have increased in popularity.
  • During the week ending May 30, 2009, Facebook displaced MySpace as the top social network ranked by visits and has since also become the second ranked website overall behind Google.
  • For the week ending September 5, 2009, Facebook captured nearly 58% of visits in the Social Networking custom category, followed by MySpace with 31%.
  • There are several drivers that have helped the growth of Facebook – such as a cleaner layout and mobile applications on the iPhone and BlackBerry to access Facebook anywhere. Another is certainly the Facebook Connect program, which allows users to share stories in their news feed and make comments on websites and blogs. The program launched in beta during July of last year, then officially launched to developers in early December. The number of websites participating in Facebook Connect has grown quickly to over 15,000 websites (globally) including CNN.com, NBC.com, ABCNews.com, Hulu, WashingtonPost.com, The Huffington Post, and others. And what is really interesting is to look at the year-over-year growth in the market share of visits to Facebook because there is a clear uptick in the growth rate following the launch of Facebook Connect.
  • A clear benefit of Facebook Connect is the ability of the user to use a single portable identity – and most importantly, one password, rather than logging into multiple accounts across the network of websites. Facebook’s recent purchase of FriendFeed will also help to aggregate this single portable identity across the Internet. Participation from websites in Facebook Connect also has strong implications to appear more often in the search results executed on Facebook resulting from member postings as search becomes a more prevalent activity within this large audience.

Storybird: Collaborating Shorty Story Creation

Storybird is a service that uses collaborative storytelling to connect kids and families. Two (or more) people create a Storybird in a round robin fashion by writing their own text and inserting pictures. They then have the option of sharing their Storybird privately or publicly on the network. The final product can be printed (soon), watched on screen, played with like a toy, or shared through a worldwide library.

Storybird is also a simple publishing platform for writers and artists that allows them to experiment, publish their stories, and connect with their fans.

SES San Jose 2009: Brand, Trademark & Reputation Management

Yesterday I had the opportunity to catch up with Simon Heseltine, Senior Marketing Manager at AOL (working on the Sports and news properties). Simon and I discussed his upcoming panel at SES San Jose on the topic of “Brand, Trademark & Reputation Management” – which is a very hot topic these days, check out our chat below.

[Manoj]: How has the prevalence of social media changed the landscape of reputation management?

[Simon Heseltine]: Well, as the idea of social media sites is to connect people and allow them to create content that’s shared, that’s a biggie in terms of reputation management. Nowadays you have people tweeting about how they disliked the meal they just ate, creating videos about how an airline destroyed their guitar, or just writing blog posts about how much they hate a company or product.

Many social media sites have the concept of groups, linking people together around a single topic, which is just as likely to be how much they hate your brand as it is how much they love it. What’s more interesting is that you may find that in one venue the groups are more positive while in another they’re lean the other way. I saw in one instance where one individual had taken it upon himself to answer every question in Yahoo Answers that involved a particular industry, and to answer it in a very negative manner. Which goes to show that one person can make a difference.

[Manoj]: How does one begin the process of protecting their brand online?

[Simon Heseltine]: Once you’ve identified the places where your brand is discussed, or places where it could / should be discussed, your brand needs to have a presence in those places. If you can have that presence active in those sites before any issues around your brand arise, then you’re much more likely to be listened to than a user that registered that day and is responding with their first post.

Of course the important thing there is identifying those online sites where your brand is discussed. While you may think that you know those places because you visit them yourself, or they’re standard industry sites, you may want to think again. At my last company – Serengeti Communications – we had a custom built buzz monitoring tool that would look at historical buzz for a brand. With this we were able to identify that for one of the clients the buzz was primarily coming from 2 forums, for another client the buzz was primarily from a single forum, and for another it was spread throughout thousands of blogs, forums and social sites.

Until you look at where the buzz is you don’t really know whether you’re deploying your resources as effectively as possible.

[Manoj]: What are the best tools to monitor your online reputation?

[Simon Heseltine]: Let me start out by saying that there’s no tool out there that’s going to give you visibility into every utterance of your keywords across the web. Why? Well just remember that not every page on the internet gets indexed. In some cases it’s accidental, such as a site being blocked in the robots.txt. In other cases it’s by design. If you’re in the medical field and you want to know what doctors are saying about your product / service then the best place to look is SERMO. All you need now is your physicians ID to log in… don’t have one? Then you’re out of luck.

The basic tools that anyone can use are the Google and Yahoo alerts, they give you visibility into what those search engines find, and are usually fairly timely at letting you know when they find something new (usually several minutes after a blog post that mentions the keywords goes live).

The next level of information is to add in RSS feeds from sites that provide them and that you know have had some history of mentioning your keywords / you anticipate may in the future. RSS feeds are great in that you can set the up and just check them all in your feed reader at any time, any new mentions will be listed for you to check out.

When you look at more automated solutions they range from the free – The Buzz Monitor, an open source solution developed by the World Bank – and inexpensive – Andy Beal’s Trackur – to the multi thousand dollar solutions that that provide additional features such as relationship analysis or sentiment analysis. But you should always make sure to take a look at where they’re sourcing their data from. If it’s just from Google Blogsearch is that going to capture all of the locations that your company or product is talked about?

What you really need to do is know where the discussions are currently happening, and at a minimum monitor those locations. RSS feeds are a great way to monitor quite a bit of ‘the known’. However, there are sites that don’t have RSS feeds,

[Manoj]: What are some of the issues that you’ve encountered with reputation monitoring?

[Simon Heseltine]: I’d have to say that the biggest one is probably spam and ambiguity. For instance if you’re monitoring the term “SIPA” are you looking to read about:

Specialized Information Publishers Association School of International and Public Affairs (Columbia University) Southern Interscholastic Press Assocaition (USC) The national sport of the Phillipines All of them are valid, but the chances are you’re only looking for one of those terms. If one or more of the others have high levels of online discussion then you’re going to be hunting for the needle of your brand mentions in the haystack of results.

Sometimes your brand will get a mention or 2 on a completely out of the ordinary site, and if you’re not looking for it you won’t find it. One University I worked with had mentions on Russian military forums, a Subaru owners fan club forum, and a bizarre blog that was some form of tribute to an elven god. While the latter could be laughed at, the other 2 provided opportunities to potentially connect with audiences that may have been interested in their offerings.

Finally, sentiment analysis is an issue that is very tricky to automate. The English language allows for sarcasm, double and treble negatives, colloquialisms, and slang. How can an automated system say with certainty what is positive, what is negative and what is neutral? Especially when those definitions may change from industry to industry, and company to company. For one company getting a mention in a press article about a competing company may be positive, as it shows that they’re thought of within that industry, for another that may just be neutral.

[Manoj]: Do you have any final words to share?

[Simon Heseltine]: If you’re not monitoring the buzz around your brand, you can bet that one of your competitors will be, and they’ll be only too happy to capitalize on any bad buzz around your brand, and to try and move any good buzz their way by engaging with your audience.