Latest Jobs

UK and US FlagsDigital Marketing, Social Media, Web Design, Development, Analytics and Security.

Measure and Management Tools

Figure with wrenchOur guide to useful tools by type and price.

Advertise with Us

blue dart on targetTake your products and services to our highly engaged audience.

Video Walkthroughs

Internet Marketing WordsStep by step on screen visual expert guides.

Hot Topics
Internet Law
Salary Reports
Mobile
Website Optimization
Hot Topics
Social Media
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Google+
Hot Topics
Digital Marketing
Analytics Tools
Google Analytics
Internet Business
Search our Site Content
Loading

Content marketing: what’s really changed for marketing?



Organizing for Content: Models to Incorporate Content Strategy and Content Marketing in the Enterprise from Altimeter Group Network on SlideShare

DigitalContent

Never slow to adopt the new shiny, the marketing industry has grabbed digital content by the horns and it made it its own. It has also given it a name too – content marketing – which helps with the hype.

Anyone or any business that has something to sell has forever used content to help sell it – whether that’s a script for telesales conversations, direct marketing copy or homepage content.

However, with technology enabling us to create and share content like never before the digital marketing industry has rightly cottoned on to the opportunity of creating compelling content to engage customers and potential customers.

Altimeter, a research consultancy, has just published a report on content marketing (see slide deck above). It interviewed 70 organisations to establish how they are using content in their marketing strategies. The top priority for external social strategies for the year ahead is content marketing (57%), followed by developing ongoing engagement with customers (50%), listen/learn from customers (41%), customer support through social channels, influencer/ambassador programme (27%) and website integration (25%).

So what’s the aim of creating this content? Is it fundamentally doing the same job as it always has done or is there more to it?

My time spent working across an editorial team and a marketing team provided me with some useful insights into how the two disciplines approach content. The marketing approach was very focused on lead generation and nurturing users who had – in some way – ‘engaged’ with the content. Once a user had clicked on a link to download a whitepaper, for example, their details were fed into the CRM and lead nurturing system. From that point on they were ‘nurtured’ in a variety of ways.

What stood out in this process was the campaign approach to creating and sharing content. Each campaign had clear customer acquisition goals. This approach is for all intents and purposes a 21st century version of age-old sales and marketing techniques – create interest and demand for your product and services by developing useful and relevant content.

Another approach to content marketing is born out of the need to be found in search. Google wants to reward original and good – as voted by readers - content. You only have to look at recent algorithm updates to see this. So, create original, good quality content on a regular basis and watch the traffic increase.

Well, that’s exactly what UK SEO agency Essential Marketer has been doing. The agency has doubled traffic to its site by simply running daily articles and sharing it across all social channels.

Econsultancy’s series of reviews of how brands are using content across social channels also provides some useful insights. Not surprisingly, a common finding is that brands are using social channels to share campaign content and provide customer service. Here are some of the brands they have looked at:

Despite the hype and relative newness of content marketing the way content is used remains pretty much the same. Now that may all be well and good, but is it enough? This point was well made by Justin Pearse, head of innovation at marketing services agency Bite, in a recent Guardian article. Pearse argues that there is a danger companies will start to produce poor quality content to continue to feed growing consumer demand.

We’re facing a content deluge online in 2013. The interruptive advertising model of old is fast dying out as digital media gives always-on consumers the ability to take control of their relationships with brands. Content is being seen, often correctly, as one way to help build these relationships.

The very real danger is that this leads to an outpouring of poor quality, unfocused content produced purely to satisfy the algorithmic demands of SEO or social media.

 

Which brings me back to my time sitting across an editorial team and a marketing team. Whilst the marketing team focused on building campaigns to drive the business, who was producing the relevant, timely, quality content? Who was providing the insight to help create the most engaging content? The editorial team.

And why was the editorial team so important in the content marketing equation? Because their sole focus was on creating and developing the most useful, interesting, entertaining and relevant content for their readers day in, day out. It was the editorial team that researched the readers, developed relationships with the readers and had the reader at the centre of all they did.

This approach is hard to sustain if your focus is on campaigns. Will there ever be enough campaigns to support with content? Or will the need to provide ongoing relevant and timely content (campaign or no campaign) just lead to a deterioration in quality, as Pearse suggests?

This is the challenge facing organisations looking to create compelling content: how to build sustainable content strategies. To do so, organisations will require a mix of marketing and editorial expertise and processes and an infrastructure to support content production.

And once you have this you can then look at how you can use social tools to leverage the content held within your organisation – to turn your organisation inside out so that it lets the customers in and lets some of the organisational expertise out. But that’s the subject for another post . . .

Image Courtesy of Meridith Atwater for opensource.com on flickr

Subscribe by Email

What is a Service Level Agreement?



What is a Service Level Agreement (SLA)?

gavelsmall

SLA is the common abbreviation used for a service level agreement. When providing software services to customers via the internet (SaaS services) you need to include a SLA in your SaaS agreement, either as part of the main terms of your SaaS agreement or in a specific SLA schedule. A SLA should set out the following support and maintenance services that you will provide to customers to ensure that the SaaS software is made properly available to them.

Availability

The level of availability of the software should be stated in percentage terms. The basis on which availability is calculated should be included i.e. monthly, annually and any exclusions from the calculation should be clearly stated.

Software Support and Maintenance

Customer support is usually provided to assist customers when problems arise with the availability or functioning of your software. Customer support provisions should include:

  • A description of the support services to be provided;
  • The times and days on which support will be provided;
  • How support will be provided i.e. online, via telephone;
  • Response and resolution times for dealing with software problems; and
  • Maintenance times for carrying out updates, repair and maintenance to your software.

Hardware Maintenance

SaaS supplier use servers (hardware) usually located in a third party data centre to host their software. The provisions to be included in a SLA will be determined by the level of service that the third party data centre provides to the supplier. The data centre provisions should be reflected in the terms of your SLA but will generally include:

  • A brief description of the security provisions in place at the data centre;
  • A brief description of the technical infrastructure at the data centre;
  • Any applicable disaster recovery provisions;
  • Backups of data.

Commercial Considerations

The way in which you incorporate a SLA into your SaaS agreement and the degree of detail that you provide to customers will largely depend upon the following:

  • The type of SaaS products and services you are supplying;
  • How much the customer pays for the product and services;
  • Whether the product or service is business critical i.e. online banking;
  • What is standard in that particular business area; and
  • The terms of the hosting agreement with your data centre.

image courtesy of Sam Howzit

Subscribe by Email

Web Analytics: How deep should you dig?



Nothing is more important than knowledge in professional life. Contextual knowledge, knowledge of usable networks, sources and future developments. Nothing should be more important in a company (apart of course from the people who work with the data) than data. Only reliable data sources can provide managers with information on historical successes and current and future target achievements. Only data provides a usable, combinable and valid source of assessable decisions.

Web Analytics is an integral part of this vital data flow for entrepreneurs, managers and experts. Web Analytics may act as primary and/or complementary source of knowledge and is therefore indispensable, especially in the future.

Analytical Benefit

How much benefit can be derived from web analysis that provides optimization options based on metrics and analytics reporting? The general answer is certainly “a lot!”, although subjectivity will always augment final decision making.

However, in this process of analysis remember to apply the law of Gossen. We all know Gossen’s law of diminishing marginal utility – even in terms of web analytics and conversion optimization Gossen’s Law comes into play.

A redesign of email format might lead to increased newsletter registrations. Avoiding getting lost in the minutest detail, probably also helps the conversion. Even a minimal chance of synergy between two campaigns may have a positive effect on sales.

But at what price?

At what cost?

Gossen´s law

There is the law of diminishing marginal utility of the economy (or First Gossen’s law), which is based on the assumption that the magnitude of a given pleasure decreases continuously as we continue to satisfy it until, at last, saturation occurs. Applying this in a digital context, it can be represented, albeit simply, here in this chart:

Gossen Law in Digital Analytics

The more investment a web analyst makes in a project or a general optimization, the smaller the benefit over time. A quick optimization change is often the beginning of a project; leading to more continuous improvement or conversion increases which are only achievable with significantly higher costs. This law of diminishing marginal utility is universal enough to be frequently observed in practice with users!

In order to make the available (though often necessary) small steps, requires a maximum effort of the staff. But – and here is the crux of this model – in most cases it is necessary to accurately perform these minor improvements, or to gain a competitive edge through detailed work, in order to become a successful online store rather than a less successful one. Human effort is required to succeed in taking a confusing, not goal-orientated, search and redesigning it to create a perfectly designed internal search tool – so that you might achieve that essential digital competitive advantage.

The real challenge is that we have long since arrived, in many areas of the knowledge economy, at the point of the minimum marginal utility, so that the difference is small, but crucial. Relevant optimization and targeted increased conversion that can identify a market difference – can only be achieved with great effort. This effort must always be set against the potential benefits. Economic models that are applicable across a range of sectors and which have stood the test of time are becoming increasingly popular. Be it the phenomenon of over-optimization or the Six Sigma DMAIC cycle (Define, Measure, Act, Invest, Control). 

Nowadays a lot of companies still struggle with the benefits of using Web Analytics software. This will change and more and more departments will see the value of data-driven decisions. So, do not only feed your software with data – feed your brain with knowledge and experience. As soon as you come to a border and remind yourself on Gossen´s law; you need to decide if it is worth investing the additional efforts to get close to perfection or if you should concentrate on parallel projects within Digital Business. 

Subscribe by Email

5 Things Vendors of Tag Management Systems may not tell you



Tag Management Systems (TMS) promise independence from IT and thus quicker deployment of new tracking code, faster load times, lower switching costs, and a lot of other wonderful things. But even though TMS definitely have their benefits, you should know about some issues vendors may be reluctant to tell you.

Tag Management is “da hype” in the realm of Digital Analytics and Online Marketing. There are at least a dozen vendors with a sensible offering (Tealium, TagMan, Ensighten, BrightTag, DC Storm, Impact Radius, QuBit, Site Tagger, SuperTag, Tag Commander, UberTags, Google Tag Manager, and you name it). Some of them have very active marketing departments and scream at you about their benefits at every corner of the internet.

Google has made Tag Management Systems mainstream
Google came out last year with its own free Tag Manager, making Tag Management mainstream by giving everybody the chance to try out what it actually feels like – similar to how Google Analytics proselytized the masses about Web Analytics. Adobe then recently made its own Tag Manager free of charge and has been pushing you to use it ever since. Actually, when you set up a site for  SiteCatalyst now, you have to go through the backdoor to get the “original” SiteCatalyst code and not the Tag Manager code. Adobe is probably aware of the usually tedious implementation, one of the main reasons why sometimes SiteCatalyst installations remain shy of their awesome potential, but it probably is also a strategy to lock people into their (very good) products and take away one of the benefits away that TMS give you: The lower switching costs to other vendors.

If you are serious about Digital Marketing, evaluate a TMS
Don’t get me wrong: I am a fan of TMS. I think everyone who takes Web Analytics and Online Marketing seriously should evaluate Tag Management Systems. I have struggled for many years with IT departments and slow release cycles that so often caused me not to try something new just because implementing it would take so long (and cost so much money), even though I knew which code had to go where. So I am the first to admit that TMS address one of the biggest needs of every Online Marketer who wants to continuously improve his online channels.

Freedom through Tag Management Systems?

Freedom through Tag Management Systems?

Not as easy as it sounds
But switching to a Tag Management System and operating one isn’t as easy as it sometimes may sound. Here are some things that vendors will tell you only reluctantly – and one thing you should be aware of when settling for the “free” offers from Google or Adobe.

1. A Tag Management System doesn’t mean independence from your IT.

With a TMS, you can put any JavaScript code on your website, even code that produces little popup windows greeting every visitor with “Hi Erica, did you water your flowers today?”. And as much as the following message hurts: Your IT should know about your TMS’s capabilities, because a little tracking code can cause bugs in other critical functions of your website – you don’t have to create silly popup windows for that to happen.

So involve your IT from the start when evaluating a TMS. If you don’t, they will mistrust you even more – or block the TMS’s introduction entirely. In the end, a sensible tag deployment process still involves your IT: Only the IT should have the right to “publish” new tags (this hurts so much!), and they should be reviewing your tags before they go live. Hopefully, after a while they find out that you do no evil and speed up the review process. And being able to test tags on your live system is already a great improvement. Because then you know if it works before your IT implements it on a test system.

And more,  that doesn’t mean that you don’t gain more flexibility with a TMS. As one of our clients recently put it: “We won’t gain independence from IT, but we will gain independence from releases.” And in big, slow-moving companies where releases (updates to the website) come only once or twice a year, this is a major upgrade.

2. “There’s this one “universal/container tag”, and that’s it in terms of putting code on the site, right? Because from then on, I can do everything in the TMS’s admin interface, can’t I?“

No. You will definitely reduce the amount of (on-site) coding needed, and you can deploy a lot of tags directly through the Admin interface, but for many things, it is recommended you use a “data layer” to transmit page-specific information and keep this data separate from other stuff on the website. A data layer means additional code in the HTML of your pages that has to be implemented by IT. Specialized Event Tracking mostly requires additional coding, too, by the way.

Why? Doesn’t my Tag Management System allow me to dynamically collect whatever the value of the JavaScript variable “total_price” is or the text inside of the DOM element with the id “pricetag”? Yes, it probably does. But the developer that creates and manages this JavaScript variable or this DOM element doesn’t know nor see in his code that your TMS needs this information. So next time he changes the variable name or the DOM element’s id, your TMS suddenly won’t get these crucial values anymore, and thus the five third-party tags that hinge on them – and it may be hard to find out why.

That’s why I recommend to put all the needed page-specific information into this separate data layer. The developer will then know that the data layer code is for the Tag Management System only, and that he better not change it without consulting with you.

What that means is: Any time you want to track new stuff that is not yet in this data layer, you will probably need new code on the website itself, meaning new variables and values for your data layer.

(See a very good how-to for data layers by the legendary Justin Cutroni)

3. Migrating to a Tag Management System can be a migraine. An expensive one.

Migrating to a TMS is like switching to a new Web Analytics tool for your site.  And if you haven’t documented very well which tracking code does what on which parts of your site (which is lamentably the case for 99% of websites), be prepared for a lot of surprises of the “why is x not being tracked anymore?” type.

You can and maybe should do a “vendor-by-vendor” approach, migrating the easiest vendors’ tags first. In the meantime, you can also get comfortable with your TMS via “easy” examples. But in order to migrate more complex Analytics code, say your heavily customized Google Analytics Tracking Code to Google Tag Manager, you need to replace all the GA code on a page at the same time.

Say for example, you have a GA-tagged page with an insurance price calculator that works with Flash or Ajax and does a lot of Event Tracking. You can’t simply replace the GA Base Tag in the head of the HTML by the TMS’s “universal tag” because then, the Event Tracking for your price calculator won’t work anymore. You have to migrate ALL the code on a particular page simultaneously, including the Event Tracking in the calculator. This slows down migration. You may use your TMS’s code on page A and your “native” GA code on page B though. 

(Note that some TMS may not have this problem. Ask your vendor.)

4. Tag Management Systems are easier than learning JavaScript, but they are not self-explanatory – you need PEOPLE with KNOW-HOW of these systems.

Adding a TMS means another tool in your arsenal. A tool needs people that know how to work with it (at least three, because one may leave, and the other one may be sick or on vacation). In some companies where every new tool needs to go through an extensive approval process, this can be a real problem. And building up the know-how needs an investment by the company. This could be more crucial for the TMS than for other systems, given the TMS’s central role for all kinds of analytics or marketing tags. Lose that one person with knowledge of the system, and you have a problem in more than just one area.

5. Adobe’s and Google’s Tag Management Systems are good for their own products, but not for other vendor tags.

Analytics tool vendors are not the greatest fans of Tag Management Systems because TMS make it a little easier to switch from a tool to another one. The only exception are, of course, the vendors’ own tools. So if you’re all into Google tools, you may be fine with Google Tag Manager (even though GTM doesn’t support Google Analytics Content Experiments so far). Likewise with Adobe’s Tag Manager.

But both Tag Mangers were made so you stick with their tools, not their competitors’. So they are not that good at integrating tags of, say, Webtrends. Moreover, the functionality of most of the paid TMS heavily outlasts GTM or Adobe’s Tag Manager.

So even if the Adobe or Google product may seem like an obvious choice because it integrates with your main product, think twice and do evaluate a paid vendor as well.

Your turn!
Are you currently evaluating a TMS? What have been your biggest issues when migrating to a TMS or when operating one? How did you get your IT’s buy-in? I am curious to read about other experiences.

Subscribe by Email

Leverage Free YouTube Data for Competitive Intel



I just wrote an article on my (other) blog about Orabrush, as an example of how to do YouTube and social media marketing right. If you’re looking for some inspiration for your marketing efforts and your budget is non-existent, I highly recommend Orabrush’s marketing strategy.

One of the things I did in that piece was to list some success metrics:

  • Within 2 days, the video was featured on the home page of YouTube
  • Within 4 weeks, they had over 10 million views
  • Using features already in YouTube, they offered free samples to people who made it through the first half of the video

But I don’t work for Orabrush, and I was never part of their marketing team. So how do I know what happened?

On YouTube every video has a “statistics” tab underneath that lets you get some good insight into that video’s performance.

It's the little picture of a graph on the bottom right - click on that.

It’s the little picture of a graph on the bottom right – click on that.

When you open that up, you can see what video milestones have happened. Things like the first ad campaign, view from a mobile device, referral from another website; all of these count as milestones. You can also see how quickly views grew over time. Most importantly from a marketing perspective, you can also see engagement and audience metrics.

Milestones look like this:

milestones

You can see, for example, that it was the ad they ran at point “G” that drove significant growth in views. However, you don’t know what that ad was or how it ran. Does it matter? Maybe. If you’re a competitor, you might want to target the same audience that Orabrush targeted in their ad campaign. Running on the same website or ad network might be handy.

If you’re a smaller player or just a marketer looking for inspiration, it’s enough. I’ve now learned that even a brand that had lots of previous success on YouTube still needs to “feed and water” new video content with ads and referrals. I now know that it takes more than great content to drive page views. It takes a larger strategy to build that audience, and I’d better consider how I’m going to drive people to that content.

Not sure what your target audience looks like? This is where the demographic data comes in handy.

audience

I’ve learned that this video is popular with teenagers and older men in the US, Canada, and Australia. That helps me generate ideas for my own content. As a brand marketer, I might make my message or content a little less serious and more fun to engage this audience. I probably don’t need to worry about translation or subtitles in non-English languages.

I can also see that despite having a lot of views (over 1.8 million), engagement is never very high. Of the total audience, only 0.11% “liked” the video and less than half of that number commented or favorited the content. (Incidentally, never use YouTube comments to measure brand satisfaction. That’s like checking the writing in your bathroom stall to see if customers are satisfied with their store experience.)

This data appears under almost every video on YouTube because most subscribers and brands don’t realize it’s there. So what’s the best way to use it? Find out what your competitors are doing and check the stats. Watch several videos to get a feel for engagement, who’s sending traffic, and what their audience looks like.

Subscribe by Email

Broad Match is Dead. Long Live Broad Match



When launching a new paid search account, restructuring an existing account, or creating a new campaign, limiting where your ads are shown is essential. Showing your ads to the right target audience and carefully selecting when your ads are shown will lower what you pay per click and allow you to allocate spend to new campaigns.

You simply cannot trust Google (pro tip: Google is in it for the money) or any other search engine. Google defines broad match as “any relevant variations of your keywords, including synonyms, singular and plural forms, possible misspellings, stemmings, related searches, and other relevant variations.” Google’s expansive definition creates the potential for a lot of unwanted impressions. Why give search engines the opportunity to select what keywords you target. At Obility we have seen egregious examples of Google displaying ads for keywords not remotely relevant to the target broad keyword.

The example below shows the search term report for a client targeting client brand checks broad match. When targeting keywords with the client brand name, advertisers can reasonably expect Google to only show ads related to the client brand. However, when viewing the search term report, we found not only our ads being shown for competitor terms but also for incredibly broad terms (e.g. business checks, order checks, print checks, harland clarke). Google basically chooses to display your ad for anything remotely relevant to the broad keyword you are targeting.

SEARCH TERM

Gain Control with Modified Broad Keywords

Conversely, you cannot limit your account to exact and phrase match either. This simply leaves too much opportunity on the table.

Modified broad match (mod broad in PPC lingo) should be used liberally. Mod broad allows for keyword discovery while reigning in Google overreach. Modified broad (where advertisers identify one or more keywords that much be in the search query with a plus sign e.g. +modified broad must include the term modified) give advertisers a powerful tool to target long tail keywords while maintaining significant control of what keywords are targeted.

Use mod broad and phrase match keywords for discovery: identifying new keywords that perform well. Exact match keywords should be used to apply stringent bid control. While modified broad and phrase give advertisers an opportunity to reach a larger audience, exact match keywords allow better control of what an advertiser is willing to pay for target terms.

In addition to mod broad keyword targeting, advertisers should also frequently use search term reports (STRs) provided by the AdWords UI. Obility recommends running account STRs bi-weekly. Run both ad group and keyword level STRs to provide information on both new keywords and negative keywords.

Tighten Targeting

While broad matching keywords can be damaging to account performance, negatively targeting broad match terms can significantly increase clickthrough rate and improve account performance. Use negative broad terms whenever you are not going to block a potentially relevant term (e.g. job and jobs should often be added as negative broad match terms). Use both campaign and ad group negative broad match terms. While campaign negative keywords are typically used to limit where your ads are shown, ad group negative keywords are best used to prevent your target keywords from competing against each other (e.g. negatively target software in a general lead management ad group so that its keywords don’t compete with a lead management software ad group).

In addition to negative keyword targeting, controlling your account settings are essential. Google being Google defaults campaign settings to target misspellings and near match for exact match keywords. This means that if you target lead score, Google could potentially show ads for leading scorer. At Obility, we recommend turning off misspelling targeting for all campaigns other than Brand and Competitor.

When Broad Makes Sense

As with all blanket statements of trends being dead – think the constant refrain of SEO is dead – use of broad match targeting in paid search can make sense when used sparingly. The trouble with only targeting mod broad, phrase, & exact match keywords is that they are expensive. Advertisers willing to pay more for these terms has ratcheted up cost per click (CPC) leading to many instances where targeting broad keywords makes sense.

For example, we have a client offering email marketing as part of its platform. Email marketing terms are incredibly competitive where advertisers are paying $40-50 per click. Our client was paying over $35 per click for 5th position for many general email marketing terms when targeting with exact match. However when targeting broad match best email marketing software, our client would pay less than half the cost.

email marketing

The table above shows what our client was paying per click to appear for searches for email marketing (search term impression) using two different methods: one, we targeted best email marketing software broad match; the other we targeted email marketing exact match. As you can see, targeting exact match is considerably more expensive and led to essentially the same position. While targeting broad match relinquishes some control, Google tends to award that recklessness with cheaper CPC’s.

A Mixed Strategy is Best

Our recommended strategy is a paid search account that prioritizes top terms (i.e. high bids for top exact and phrase match terms) but also includes lower bids for broad match terms that are too expensive to target with phrase or exact match. Not surprisingly, this is a difficult balance to attain and requires quite a bit of experimentation.

Takeaways:

  1. Keep broad match targeting to a minimum
  2. Use modified broad targeting liberally
  3. Search term reports should be run regularly
  4. Copious use of negative broad terms
  5. Campaign settings should limit targeting of misspellings
  6. Broad keywords have their place
Subscribe by Email

Why we can’t just be SEOs: A reply to Rand Fishkin



Image of a globe with the title SEO representing SEO practisesLast week I saw this interesting whiteboard Friday which talked about ‘Why We Can’t Just Be SEOs Anymore’ by Rand. Though he has raised some valid points, like ‘perception of SEO is hard to change’, I have to disagree with him overall.  Sorry Rand, you are missing the complete picture. 

 

SEO is not bigger than SEO

SEO is all about generating relevant organic traffic to the website through search engines. That’s it. SEO is not about email, CRO, UX, Social Media, Branding, PR, Reputation Management, Coding, Advertising, Customer Service …

You may argue that there are 200+ ranking signals so I need total control on everything which influences SEO. While it is true that they are 200+ ranking signals, don’t forget the 80/20 rule i.e. 80% of your output comes from 20% of the input. If you have worked in the SEO industry long enough, you already know what that 20% is that will generate 80% of the SEO results.

That 20% consists of basic on-page optimization, keyword research, content development and above all link building. We can tweak brand signals, social signals, authorship, Page Rank, markups and other weak ranking signals all day long but they won’t generate any considerable amount of organic traffic on our website. What really drives traffic is that 20% I am talking about.

If we talk about the real world (which could be very different from the blogging world) there could be unlimited ranking signals. For a start, your client is a very strong ranking signal for you. Without his support and cooperation you can’t make any change on his website. No amount of SEO is going to help, if the client is not responsive to your needs and demands. Poor product, bad reputation, poor customer service all are sort of ranking signals which are beyond our control. 

Just because something may impact your SEO so you must develop expertise in it or take total control of it is a wrong mindset. Here is why. When someone works as a marketing generalist who knows little bit of everything (well sorry but this is what specialists really think about him) he is eager to give suggestions to specialists (like CRO consultant, PR consultant, Community Managers etc) on how they can do their job better.

Since he is not a specialist, his suggestions may not be well received or align well with the recommendations of specialists. This creates disruption in digital strategies and work environment. So instead of creating synergy the marketing generalist could inevitably end up creating stress and chaos. 

 

The Perception of SEO is hard to change so we should change the job title

There are lots of job titles out there which have earned a bad name over time like car salesmen, lawyers, brokers, cold callers etc. There is hardly any industry left where you won’t find people who give the whole industry a bad name. Even in a profession as noble as Health Care you can find doctors who steal kidneys and are involved in the illegal organ trade. So have they changed their job titles? No.

So this argument of bad perception of SEO is not strong enough to drop the SEO title. 

 

We are selling ourselves short by not calling ourselves a SEO

That is true. When we say we do email, CRO, UX, Social Media, Branding, PR, Reputation Management, Coding, Advertising, Customer Service….all in the name of SEO or whatever titles we prefer, say ‘Inbound Marketer’, we are not only spreading ourselves too thin but are abnormally raising the expectations of our clients. With so many marketing channels being leveraged they will definitely earn tons of money. Won’t they?

We are also holding ourselves responsible for client’s sales ability as we are now in charge of CRO, UX, branding, customer service, PR etc. All of these are full time jobs in themselves. And if we have to do all of these jobs and practically run the entire business then a monthly retainer can never be profitable, partnership in client’s business and profit will be. While we can make SEO as big as we like, do as much volunteer work as we want, don’t expect the clients to handover their business to us just because we practice every marketing tactic in the book. At the end of the day even business development managers (who are specially hired to develop businesses) are handed over a monthly pay slip instead of partnership in business and profits, let alone SEO. 

 

Subscribe by Email